Few organizations monitor author-targeted misconduct with the rigor the current publishing climate demands. Most accounts exist in isolation—scattered across complaint boards, informal forums, and individual experiences—leaving the larger patterns obscured. A centralized reporting system closes that gap by creating a continuous, verifiable record of conduct that can be analyzed over time. It clarifies how certain tactics recur, how companies reconstitute themselves, and how writers are approached across different channels. In an environment where predatory operations often present a polished, professional facade, this consolidated body of evidence is one of the strongest tools available for establishing accountability and protecting writers.